Mixed-use property: two uses, one parcel, frequent errors
A shop below and a flat above are assessed differently, and the split is often stale.
A building with commercial space at street level and residential above is common on Illinois main streets and is assessed as a blend.
Where it goes wrong
- The split is stale. An apartment converted to office years ago, or the reverse, and never re-coded.
- Square footage allocated wrongly between uses.
- Wholly commercial classification for a building that is mostly residential — which matters most in Cook, where classes are assessed at different levels.
- A vacant upper floor assessed as though let.
What to bring
A floor plan with areas by use. Leases showing what is actually let and for what. Photographs of vacant or unusable space. If an upper floor is unusable — no separate access, failing a code requirement — document it; that is a value fact, not an excuse.
Comparables are hard
True mixed-use comparables are scarce, which makes the income approach and factual corrections more productive than a uniformity argument. Where you can find genuinely similar buildings nearby, use them, but expect the assessor to distinguish them.